beermat: (Default)
greg elkin ([personal profile] beermat) wrote2003-10-21 02:07 pm

geosynchronous / geostationary

why is apx 36,000Km the orbit for geosynchronous satellites? Isn't any orbit (at the right speed) geosynchronous?

[identity profile] sciamachy.livejournal.com 2003-10-21 07:33 am (UTC)(link)
They stay put for a fair while - their orbit ends up decaying sometimes as has been previously stated elsewhere, because of the action of the moon's gravity, micro-meteorites, solar wind, and other such teeny-tiny forces that can have an effect over time. Hence they send up the Space Shuttle every so often to straighten out the orbits of the more expensive satellites. :-)

[identity profile] tacd.livejournal.com 2003-10-21 10:47 am (UTC)(link)
Holy crap.

I say 'that's the best thing I've ever seen on the Internet' quite often, but honest to God I mean it in regards to this applet. I had no idea that anything so fucking amazing had been made.

I... I might have to enable Active Desktop and set this as my wallpaper. Oh God.

[identity profile] lostcarpark.livejournal.com 2003-10-21 07:34 am (UTC)(link)
A geosynchronous will generally be more stable than a low-Earth orbit because there isn't nearly as much of Earth's stray atmosphere floating around at that altitude. However, even at this distance there is matter floating around which has a slight effect on the orbit. There is also the gravitational pull of the Moon whill will gradually pull the satellite about in it's orbit, so geosynchronous do need to expend fuel to make course corrections too. I think ground stations sometimes need to make adjustments for sattelites that have drifted out of their original orbits too.